Ir al contenido principal

Houston, Tranquillity Base here. The Eagle has landed

Throughout the years,  we have seen space as something far away and with lots of mysteries that we have not been able to solve or to even try to understand. An example of this is the "Dark Side of the moon" or even the theory of aliens and other lives. 

Even though those things are still a mystery, we still have the fact that we have visited space and even landed on the moon. This moment was really hard due to the fact that technology was not advanced and there was not enough research for creating what we needed.  Also, it is important to mention that people who developed software did not have a methodology to follow, so there were many malpractices in the development of some of the programs. 

In the case of the mission Apollo11, and the whole Apollo program, the US  government had some trouble due to the fact that they needed to ask universities to help them to develop the technology. 

These requirements and the stress of the due date for the program became the problems for the development of the project. In this case, MIT had the opportunity to prove to them that scientist has the knowledge and ways to create new things to help society. Also, there is a chance to show them that teamwork makes the difference, but the correct way to do it was the problem.  Another problem they got into was the freedom they had to solve each problem the US government asked them to solve. 

I consider that the teamwork and the innovation they had to go through was the real achievement in the mission, and also that we have learned there are some malpractices that nowadays programmers should not follow. The problems they had though the mission could have been skipped they had known there were a process and good practices such as documentation,  getting the requirements and doing what they been asked to do. 

This mission was something important in our history, and as engineers, we should learn from the problems other people have been through. Technology has evolved and we should understand the limits and needs of our society. 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

What we should do?

Nowadays we think that computer science is a big factory, where even though that our offices are fancy and do not look like an office, we just program to generate more code, so get more money.  In this case, we think that coding is just an alone activity that does not include more activities, such as the whole software engineering process or something like that. As we have known,  there is a process that we should follow to generate code in a more efficient way and something that our users really need and when they need it. As time goes by, there was a point where we thought that cascade method was the ultimate idea and that its use was gonna stay forever and that its use was something that we will need to use for a while. We might get this idea from other engineers where they just get the requirements at one point and to change just for special moments accept the change. The basis is of this idea is that these type of engineers have got just enough time to really see...

I am blind without my glasses

As far as we have learned in all our classes, we should always think of our clients need and uses. But after we get the requirements, a war starts due to the fact that everyone wants to set their point or perspective as the most important one. As we have learned from this case, there is no wrong perspective, but a blindfold one. We tend to seek out what we know and to think that this will be the right answer,  because that is what our story and our world works, but there are many other options.  In this case, I can relate this case to what we live everyday on our classes, where we need to create teams with our classmates. Normally we create these teams with our friends even though they have got the same perspective  and abilities as us. This case becomes a problem because when we need to understand what the client needs and desires we can only see one way of it, when there are many others. We need to think in our users, that could be our friend  or a stranger in an...

Everyone is relevant in our life

As life has been going on, and as science has been evolving, we find out that there were more people doing certain things that we recognize one or two people.  We normally think about the faces of the company, Jobs, Gates, and so on, but not on the faces that really made it come true. That was the case of the Apollo mission, where more than one University or even one part of the government has part of it, but we only think about Aldrin, Armnstrong and Nixon.  And we normanny forget the ones that really made it possible, the scientists, mathematicians, phisics, engineers and so on.  Inside this minority group there are other groups that are part of these groups, but because of  their time,  they were not recognized of doing this job.   Personally there's one story that I like, where they say that Kennedy was going to visit the headquarters of the  mission, and due to the importance of it, and the agenda that was following, he needed to visit this p...