Ir al contenido principal

Everyone is relevant in our life

As life has been going on, and as science has been evolving, we find out that there were more people doing certain things that we recognize one or two people.  We normally think about the faces of the company, Jobs, Gates, and so on, but not on the faces that really made it come true.

That was the case of the Apollo mission, where more than one University or even one part of the government has part of it, but we only think about Aldrin, Armnstrong and Nixon.  And we normanny forget the ones that really made it possible, the scientists, mathematicians, phisics, engineers and so on. 

Inside this minority group there are other groups that are part of these groups, but because of  their time,  they were not recognized of doing this job.   Personally there's one story that I like, where they say that Kennedy was going to visit the headquarters of the  mission, and due to the importance of it, and the agenda that was following, he needed to visit this place as fast as he could. In this case a janitor didn't move from his place  even though people told him to do. Finally, he met the president and while he was there, he told him that he was helping them to put a man in the moon.

In this case there are many jobs that stay in the same place, and due to their skin color or gender,  become hidden. This was the case of Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan and Mary Jackson, women of color that become an important piece of the Mercury project and the Apollo mission, per se.  In this case, they develop the role of Katherine, a colored woman mathematician, that began her job as a computer and finished as someone as important as any other one there. 

In this case, the movie shows the segregation that they lived as colored people in the USA.  And how they stopped this rules due to something more important to them, winning the Communist. And also they showed that there are things more important than  the way we look, the way we think. 

I consider this as the most important lesson of this movie because we live in a society that tends to think about the way we look is the whole definition of who we are, without taking into consideration the way we think or what we know. 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

A kid? A kid just broke my program?

LNowadays is common to think that anyone can use your software. In this group of anyone, there is the group of people who know and people who doesn't. We, as software engineers, need to take I to consideration both sides because just anyone can get access to  information that might not be for them. A clear example of that is Netflix, which includes a restriction for kids, or YouTube and even Facebook. To get to that point we need to think in our users,  and what they could do. In software engineering there are many methods to create these elements and to really analyze if they are really necessary restrictions or add-ons. On the other hand, we need to take into consideration the data that we are managing and to really send it in the correct way  to avoid people who steal our information even though that we are not that famous or important. In the case of the movie  War Games, set at the begining of the internet connection as a service, who anyone can access just by...

I am blind without my glasses

As far as we have learned in all our classes, we should always think of our clients need and uses. But after we get the requirements, a war starts due to the fact that everyone wants to set their point or perspective as the most important one. As we have learned from this case, there is no wrong perspective, but a blindfold one. We tend to seek out what we know and to think that this will be the right answer,  because that is what our story and our world works, but there are many other options.  In this case, I can relate this case to what we live everyday on our classes, where we need to create teams with our classmates. Normally we create these teams with our friends even though they have got the same perspective  and abilities as us. This case becomes a problem because when we need to understand what the client needs and desires we can only see one way of it, when there are many others. We need to think in our users, that could be our friend  or a stranger in an...

Is UX the new design?

Nowadays there  are many ways  to create a new project, a new program, or even a new add-on, but we  live in a society  that lives in the time  where changes are needed  so soon that  sometimes design  is  not done  when it is supposed to, or a methodology is not followed, because we are focused on the project and not  the  way we develop the project.  These ideas were affected by the way technology, clients and users change their ideas and necessities.  We have been developing new ways to satisfy them, but in the process, we have been forgetting the steps that we need to follow to correctly create a new thing. Sometimes we try to develop the necessities that we think that the client has to have,  but we are not truthly sure about it.   An example of what has been told is the point where we start using Extreme Programming to develop a project. When we use this methodology, we tend to forge...