Ir al contenido principal

Is UX the new design?

Nowadays there  are many ways  to create a new project, a new program, or even a new add-on, but we  live in a society  that lives in the time  where changes are needed  so soon that  sometimes design  is  not done  when it is supposed to, or a methodology is not followed, because we are focused on the project and not  the  way we develop the project. 

These ideas were affected by the way technology, clients and users change their ideas and necessities.  We have been developing new ways to satisfy them, but in the process, we have been forgetting the steps that we need to follow to correctly create a new thing. Sometimes we try to develop the necessities that we think that the client has to have,  but we are not truthly sure about it.  

An example of what has been told is the point where we start using Extreme Programming to develop a project. When we use this methodology, we tend to forget the process of software development, and just try to make better what we just create.  This might be a problem due to the fact that people change their ideas of the project, and there is not a development of a plan and documments needed to rely on.  

Another problem that might  happen in the decision of  making or not a  development of the  design   relies on the fact that  there  might be just a moment where the team and  the customer might  get together and  the lack of design  could make that we  develop  the project in  the wrong path, double what we  have been working on and even  not satisfy the  client necessities.  

I consider that all elements of software development are important and needed to follow not just because there is a process that we need, or because we need to satisfy our company's processes but because what we are creating is not tangible. What I am referring to is  that we  should  consider  that we might not continue working on that project, of someone  will  take care of  it, or even  this is part of  something bigger and  we, as a team, need to understand it, and  not thinking about it like spaghetti code, or  like something  that I will be taking care of. We need to think in the design of a path to follow and to take care of what we are creating. 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

What we should do?

Nowadays we think that computer science is a big factory, where even though that our offices are fancy and do not look like an office, we just program to generate more code, so get more money.  In this case, we think that coding is just an alone activity that does not include more activities, such as the whole software engineering process or something like that. As we have known,  there is a process that we should follow to generate code in a more efficient way and something that our users really need and when they need it. As time goes by, there was a point where we thought that cascade method was the ultimate idea and that its use was gonna stay forever and that its use was something that we will need to use for a while. We might get this idea from other engineers where they just get the requirements at one point and to change just for special moments accept the change. The basis is of this idea is that these type of engineers have got just enough time to really see...

I am blind without my glasses

As far as we have learned in all our classes, we should always think of our clients need and uses. But after we get the requirements, a war starts due to the fact that everyone wants to set their point or perspective as the most important one. As we have learned from this case, there is no wrong perspective, but a blindfold one. We tend to seek out what we know and to think that this will be the right answer,  because that is what our story and our world works, but there are many other options.  In this case, I can relate this case to what we live everyday on our classes, where we need to create teams with our classmates. Normally we create these teams with our friends even though they have got the same perspective  and abilities as us. This case becomes a problem because when we need to understand what the client needs and desires we can only see one way of it, when there are many others. We need to think in our users, that could be our friend  or a stranger in an...

Everyone is relevant in our life

As life has been going on, and as science has been evolving, we find out that there were more people doing certain things that we recognize one or two people.  We normally think about the faces of the company, Jobs, Gates, and so on, but not on the faces that really made it come true. That was the case of the Apollo mission, where more than one University or even one part of the government has part of it, but we only think about Aldrin, Armnstrong and Nixon.  And we normanny forget the ones that really made it possible, the scientists, mathematicians, phisics, engineers and so on.  Inside this minority group there are other groups that are part of these groups, but because of  their time,  they were not recognized of doing this job.   Personally there's one story that I like, where they say that Kennedy was going to visit the headquarters of the  mission, and due to the importance of it, and the agenda that was following, he needed to visit this p...